AllPatriotsMedia » Tony Katz

Archive for Tony Katz

Is Sen. Marco Rubio trying to end the GOP Race?

MArco_Rubio

Senator Marco Rubio (R-FL,) the Tea Party favorite and well-respected first term Senator is trying to end the GOP race for president as it just starts in earnest. Rubio declared on CNN that:

The winner of Florida is in all likelihood going to be the nominee of our party

Former Governor Mitt Romney has been the front runner in Florida, outspending his main rival, former Speaker Newt Gingrich, by 15 to 1. Romney has also outspent Gingrich on TV, where Romney has spend $15.4 million to Gingrich’s $3.4 million. Yet, the latest polling from Insider Advantage has Gingrich closing the gap, with Romney at 36% and Gingrich at 31%. Public Policy Polling has Romney at 39%, Gingrich at 31%.

With ad spend advantages like that, but polling that only has Romney up by 8%, one wonders whether Rubio’s remarks have validity. If Romney wins Florida by 8%, can his supporters say that it’s a victory that will “run the table” on clinching the nomination?

Many Republicans have tried to make the case that only Romney is “electable,” and therefore the only possible competitor against President Obama in the fall. Rubio is now adding to this meme. Unfortunately, it is based on a myth. No one can properly predict who is and is not electable. One can only push forward the idea in hopes to convince others to stop backing their candidate. In this case, the conversation has led to the creation of two distinct camps; the “Establishment,” with former Senator Bob Dole, former President George H.W. Bush, Senator John McCain, Ann Coulter and Karl Rove, and the “Anti-Establishment,” with Mark Levin, former Governor Sarah Palin (kind of) and Herman Cain. (And how odd to see Newt Gingrich as the “anti-establishment” candidate, who spent 20 years as a member of Congress!)

What Rubio is saying is not based on fact, but based on a desire. With the latest polls out of Ohio and Missouri showing Romney well behind both Gingrich and former Senator Rick Santorum, perhaps Romney is a desire that the voters don’t really have.

 

I Love Ann Coulter Even When She Is Wrong

Ann Coulter joins Tony Katz live from CPAC

Here is my latest article on TownHall.com. Lots of pundits are discussing electability in the 2012 race, and no one has been more clear on the subject than Ann Coulter. She’s right about a lot of things, but, on the 2012 race, she’s simply wrong:

I Love Ann Coulter Even When She Is Wrong

Ann Coulter is wrong about Newt Gingrich. She is wrong about Mitt Romney. She is wrong about President Obama. Since the election race began, Ann Coulter has been wrong about near everything having to do with the GOP race in 2012. Yet, she’s still smarter than near everyone out there. I love Ann Coulter, even when she’s wrong.

Gingrich won the South Carolina primary by 13% over Romney. In vote total, that is 75,874 more votes for Gingrich. In context, Gingrich beat Romney by a vote total only 2000 less than Rep. Ron Paul got overall. On FOX and Friends on Sunday, Coulter responded to the victory by Gingrich in the South Carolina by admonishing the voters:

Apparently, South Carolinians would rather have the emotional satisfaction of a snotty remark toward the president than to beat Obama in the fall…We saw it in the debates when Gingrich would say things that didn’t really make sense. That is what you usually associate with Democrats, which I described in my last book, ‘Demonic,’ how mobs behave.

Coulter commenting negatively on snotty remarks is like Bill Maher commenting negatively on snotty remarks. The bigger, more accurate story is that Gingrich’s remarks were not snotty, they were accurate. South Carolina agreed that it was wrong of CNN’s John King to start a debate with so-called scandal described by Gingrich’s ex-wife Marianne Gingrich. The applause that Gingrich got Thursday night in Charleston is about a disgust for sensationalism over content. In exit polling, women voted overwhelmingly for Gingrich. If that trend follows in Florida, then it can be clearly said that female primary voters don’t care about Gingrich’s bedroom.

Coulter is wrong about the idea of electability. Legal Insurrection made this point about Coulter’s thoughts just last year: (emphasis mine)

In February 2011 she told us at CPAC (Conservative Political Action Conference) that Romney was a certain loser against Obama, now she tells us he will win. Her excuse was that she was“sick” at CPAC. She also played the birther card on the Tea Party in making the case for Romney. Inexcusable and unforgivable. Coulter’s endorsement of Romney does not a case for Romney make.

The idea of Romney electability of Obama is a myth. It is pushed by Romney supporters with tremendous passion and desire for it to be truth, but it is not. Proof shows just the opposite, as Romney lost in Iowa and South Carolina. The “inevitable” front runner is 1 for 3. Good in baseball, less good in politics. On my radio show, and in interviews across the country, I have stated that Obama can’t win re-election. Any of the men on stage right now will win over Obama.

In South Carolina, both Sen. Rick Santorum and political analyst Dick Morris made sure to stop by the Blogger Bash after their back to back appearances on Hannity Friday night. In front of a gathering of bloggers and radio hosts, Morris made the same point; Obama won’t we re-election. He went so far as to say that Republicans will win 40 states in the general election with any candidate (sans Rep. Ron Paul.)

Coulter might still be feeling scorned by her one true love, Gov. Chris Christie of New Jersey, who decided not to run for President. While questions about his conservatism persist, people love Christie’s tone, mannerisms, and attitude. They love that he’s no nonsense, that he takes on all comers. They salivate for those videos where people try to challenge him. They watch them in their entirety…waiting eagerly for the eventual smack down. Then, they cheer wildly, and share the videos on Twitter and Facebook and G+, in emails and at computer work stations. People like honesty, and respond to those who act firmly in the face of usually unanswered leftist assaults.

Coulter followed Christie in backing Romney. Romney, however, has none of these qualities. He has responded to one questioner on the concept of Capitalism with some aplomb. Otherwise, he comes off as quasi-hysterical. When he took on Gov. Rick Perry (in a conversation about hiring illegals) about who had the right to speak at the moment, his voice was not that of a man in control, but rather a scorned child who wanted her oompa-loompa now! When on FOX with Bret Baier, he called the interview absurd. Just take a look at him answering questions about when he will release his tax returns. He mumbles, he bumbles, he takes offense. Only when trounced by Gingrich does he set a firm date for their release.

Trounced, it must be said, by a man who takes on all comers, who is willing to take on the media, who isn’t afraid of a heckler. Trounced by a man who has people salivating over his debate performances. They watch them in their entirety…waiting eagerly for the eventual smackdown. Then, they cheer wildly. It’s not that they agree with Gingrich on everything, or agree with every political or personal decision he has ever made. They like someone who fights to win. They like Christie. They like Gingrich. They LOVE Ann Coulter! They would like Romney if he did the same. So far, he doesn’t.

Ann Coulter will continue to dominate big think, and will continue to do us proud when it comes to taking on nonsensical leftist talking points. She will eviscerate those who haven’t done their research. She will do it with a smile, with a historical understanding about America, its culture and its values. When she does, we will watch and cheer wildly.

I love this woman. She’s just wrong about the 2012 race.

All the best to Gabrielle Giffords

Rep_Gabrielle_Giffords

From Tony Katz:

On the day that Rep. Gabrielle Giffords got shot at an event in Tuscon, AZ, I was able to convince one of my radio stations to allow me on the air for an hour to discuss it. I knew little of Giffords, but I knew much about what could have been. This was more than a shooting, this was an attack.

Much of what came out of the aftermath of that shooting which killed six was senselessly political in nature. The Tea Party was blamed for the shooting (though it was never true), the use of “targets” on maps was considered out of bounds. There was a push for the “new tone,” which involved the new utilization of political correctness to punish us not only for our words, but how our words were delivered.

And while those on the outside hurled insults, accusation and innuendo (most recently Rep. Debbie Wasserman-Schultz who used the same “Tea Party Did It” lie just a few weeks ago) Rep. Giffords went on the course of healing. She was shot in the head. These things take time.

No one could have been more shocked to see Rep. Giffords, with some slight assistance, walk out onto the House floor for a vote. Without being told, without being asked, without wondering about party politics, the US House of Representatives broke out into thunderous applause at the sight of Giffords. She waved back. Less than a year ago she was shot in the head. There she stood…waving.

Today, she announced that she is leaving the House. In a statement, Giffords said:

Thank you for your prayers and for giving me time to recover. I have more work to do on my recovery. So to do what’s best for Arizona, I will step down this week. I’m getting better. Every day my spirit is high. I will return, and we will work together for Arizona and this great country.

I join countless numbers of Americans in wishing Rep. Giffords the very best in her recovery, and her life. Her story is not political, it is inspirational. It is one that discusses the worst in humanity, the best in medical technology and the amazement of the human spirit. In that one hour on a Saturday in January, no one could have imagined the speed of her recovery. Undoubtedly, it will continue for years to come. But what we see inspires us. It is what we want our nation to be – strong, capable, full of faith and able to rise after we fall.

Before she goes, Giffords will attend the State of the Union. That may well be the only reason to watch. For at least, when the camera pans her way, you will be inspired.

EXCLUSIVE INTERVIEW – Herman Cain talks to Tony Katz about Gingrich, Stephen Colbert and an Endorsement

Herman Cain

After appearing on Cavuto Saturday morning, former presidential candidate Herman Cain sat down with Tony Katz as he was reporting live from South Carolina for TIRNation.com. They talk about race, class warfare, Newt Gingrich and President Obama, as well as his take on Stephen Colbert and a big endorsement.

Radio Host Tony Katz referees fight between Fred Thompson and John Sununu

Fred_Thompson_Tony_Katz_John_Sununu

Radio talk show host Tony Katz spoke with former presidential candidate Fred Thompson about his thoughts to change the electoral college. Former New Hampshire Governor John Sununu interrupted the interview to disagree. More on this at TIRNation.com.

Herman Cain talks with Tony Katz, endorses America

Herman Cain

While providing live debate coverage for TIRNation.com, former presidential candidate Herman Cain stopped by to joke around with Tony Katz and Craig Robinson.

Marianne Gingrich and ABC mean little to voters in South Carolina

Diane Sawyer and George Stephanopolous

It turns out that ABC stands for Always Be Conniving. The so-called bombshell interview that Marianne Gingrich gave to ABC’s Brian Ross, where she claims that her ex-husband and presidential candidate Newt Gingrich asked her to have an “open marriage,” is having little effect on Gingrich but should have a lasting black eye and bloody nose for ABC.

Late yesterday, Drudge Report blared a siren warning that ABC had a bombshell interview with Marianne Gingrich that would effectively end Newt’s political ambitions. He had cancelled a previously scheduled press conference, lending credence to the idea that this news was big.

But it wasn’t just about the interview. ABC was supposedly having an “ethical dilemma,” deciding when to broadcast the interview – before, or after, the GOP debate in Charleston, South Carolina. Yet, ABC had no ethical dilemma in discussing publicly whether or not to air a potentially damaging interview in an attempt to influence primary results. It seems that ABC was not content enough to have George Stephanopolous and Diane Sawyer ask questions crafted from left-leaning talking points during their last debate; a debate dubbed one of the worst ever. Now they want to negatively impact other networks’ debates as well.

The story Ms. Gingrich is peddling could have impact, but if it does it isn’t being seen in South Carolina. It’s also possible that it is being overpowered. Gov. Rick Perry’s suspension of his campaign, and his subsequent endorsement of Gingrich has knocked Marianne to second place. Perry, in his endorsement, went out of his way to address Gingrich’s imperfections:

There is no viable path forward for me in the campaign….I am endorsing Newt Gingrich….we have had our differences, and Newt is not perfect, but who amongst us is? But there is forgiveness for those who seek God…it is a central tenant of my Christian faith.

The claim that Newt wanted an open marriage so he could see Calista (Newt’s 3rd and current wife) while being married to Marianne is possible, but odd. Does Calista seem like the kind of woman who would be ok with only having Newt on the side? Not really, not by a long shot. In values-centric South Carolina it could have an effect, but will there be enough time for it to show in the polls, or more importantly on primary day?

Public Policy Polling has Gingrich up 34-28 over Gov. Mitt Romney. Gingrich has the Perry endorsement. Gingrich has the momentum. As Rick Santorum has now proven, a surging candidate will defeat a consistent Romney. If Gingrich wins in South Carolina, that theory will worry many; will a last minute surge by Obama defeat a consistent Romney in a general election?

The backlash on ABC isn’t visible, but it should be. Their willingness to intentionally distort a presidential primary is disgusting. No GOP candidate should accept an invitation to another of their debates. If given another chance, who knows what they’ll do? Perhaps they’ll just call all the Obama opponents “dumb?”

Just not as “dumb” as the so-called ethical professionals at ABC.

Rick Perry endorses Newt Gingrich

RickPerryProfilePic

Governor Rick Perry announced his suspension of his presidential campaign. In North Charleston, South Carolina, Perry stated:

I ran for President because I love America….This mission is greater than any one man….What’s broken in America is not our people, it’s our politcs….What we need in Washington is a place that is humbler….

The cause of Conservatism is not in one individual…I know we can’t lose track of the ultimate objective….to defeat President Obama…we need bold, conservative leadership….the mission is greater than the man.

There is no viable path forward for me in the campaign….I am endorsing Newt Gingrich….we have had our differences, and Newt is not perfect, but who amongst us is. But there is forgiveness for those who seek God…it is a central tenant of my Christian faith.

As a Texan, I have never shied away from a fight….I know that I gave fully to a cause that is worth of this country…(my wife, Anita) has been an incredible patriot…with a good wife, with three loving children and a loving God, things are going to be good no matter what I do.

Perry Out, Florida Now Matters More Than Ever

RickPerryProfilePic

Texas Governor Rick Perry has announced that he is leaving the GOP presidential race on the eve of the second debate in Charleston, South Carolina. The latest CNN/TIME poll had Perry in last place, with 6% of the vote. Perry endorsed former Speaker Newt Gingrich

This development makes Florida more important than ever. Conventional wisdom held that if  front-runner Gov. Mitt Romney won South Carolina, he would be on his way to “running the table” and virtually assuring himself the nomination. If he lost, the race would focus on Florida to bring clarity. With Perry out, so close to the primary, it doesn’t give enough time for voters to resettle. Tonight’s debate with four instead of five will create a new dynamic, just like the five man debate did in Myrtle Beach.

Unless we witness a blow-out by Romney in South Carolina, all eyes will shift to Florida where once again they may hold the fate of the election.

Palin for Gingrich? At least in South Carolina

sarahpalin

We’ve heard the rumblings before from former Vice Presidential candidate Sarah Palin that she liked what she heard in debates from former Speaker Newt Gingrich. But Tuesday she joined in with her husband Todd by endorsing Gingrich….if only in South Carolina.

If “going rogue” is the baseline from which Palin pushes endorsements, then it all makes sense. Gingrich has had an erratic campaign, and has an erratic campaign style. His early campaign missteps (including cruises, a ill-worded attack on Rep. Paul Ryan and losing his staff) were wiped away by consistent debate performances. Once Gingrich had established himself as the “zinger” candidate, and his poll numbers rose, he moved into substance and the numbers got even bigger.

That gave way just weeks before the Iowa Caucus, where a barrage of unanswered negative ads against Gingrich by Gov. Mitt Romney and Rep. Ron Paul pushed him into a humbling fourth place finish. He shed the positive, “nice guy” approach, and went mean. Mean, in this case, meaning a blinding rage. His attack on Romney’s time at Bain Capital ended up being an attack on capitalism. The backfire was immediate, and even Gingrich admitted that his approach wasn’t a good idea. According to Craig Robinson of TIRNation.com, the film, “When Mitt Came To Town,” made by the Gingrich Super-PAC Winning the Future, “…could have been directed by Michael Moore.”

For all of that, Gingrich’s poll numbers did not suffer in South Carolina or Florida, holding at over 20% in both states. But that was before the debate in Myrtle Beach, SC, where Gingrich engaged his best performance yet. His answers on national defense and jobs were met with furious applause, and a standing ovation (to which, I have found no one who has ever seen one before in a debate.)

Palin has seen the ups and downs of a campaign, and seems to have an affinity for people who speak their minds, at nearly all times. When Palin gave her endorsement, she stated:

If I had to vote in South Carolina, in order to keep things going, I’d vote for Newt…I want to see this thing continue because iron sharpens iron, steel sharpens steel

Is that actually an endorsement, or is it something else? Why would Palin want to keep things going? Is it, as she puts it, to help the candidates make each other stronger? Is Palin using Newt as her chance to better vet the candidates in Florida? Conventional wisdom states that if Romney wins in SC, he will run the table to the GOP nomination. However, if he loses, the Florida contest on January 31st becomes pivotal, along with the two debates before the primary.

Romney has not agreed to those debates. His strategist, Stuart Stevens, said there are simply too many debates:

There are too many of these…We have to bring some order to it.  We haven’t accepted Florida…It’s kind of like a cruise that’s gone on too long

Based on Palin’s South Carolina endorsement, it seems that she has not had enough debates. If her devoted fan base listens, and votes for Newt, the race will continue, and expect to see Romney campaigning hard in Florida.