Enjoy The Show!
Podcast: Play in new window | Download
As reported by NBC 4, the Los Angeles Angels have won the bidding war for star player Albert Pujols, beating out his former club, the St. Louis Cardinals and the Florida Marlins.
The deal, rumored to be worth up to $260 million, may not be a long term winner for the organization:
The Angels’ rookie general manager Jerry Dipoto pulled off the deal,but with Pujols set to turn 32 in January,the deal may last longer than his days as a productive player. He’s actually coming off the worst season in his illustrious 11-year career,having failed to bat .300 or drive in 100 runs for the first time.
This deal baffles me. I had heard that Pujols was offered $225 million by the Cards. Was the promise of $30 million worth the move to California, where most of that will be eaten up by taxes (and where the Governor is appealing the voters to vote for higher income and sales taxes?)
Pujols certainly has the right to play where he wants if the team is willing to pay. However, this deal doesn’t look like a smart move, but rather a forced marriage. Congrats to the happy couple!
As reported by The Christian Science Monitor, via Drudge Report, California Governor Jerry Brown wants to bring a ballot initiative to the people of California, asking them to raise their own taxes.
Brown has been rebuffed by the legislative angle, where he needs a two-thirds majority for tax increases, because of Republican opposition to his proposals. So, Brown has decided to bring his case to the people of California directly:
“I am going directly to the voters because I don’t want to get bogged down in partisan gridlock as happened this year,” said Brown in a statement. “The stakes are too high.”
“The stark truth is that without new tax revenues, we will have no other choice but to make deeper and more damaging cuts to schools, universities, public safety, and our courts,” he added.
His plan (proposed as temporary) would include:
Without digging into the minutia, the current CA income tax rate is 9.3%. As has been evidenced by New York, people leave when the tax rate gets to high. As they leave, their taxable income goes with them (according to the NY Post, New York lost $4.3 billion in 2006-2007) As evidenced by Steve Malanga in the City Journal, businesses are already leaving California for that same reason.
Unfortunately for California, and Californians, we are not dealing with a man of reason. We’re dealing with Jerry Brown. In 2010, Joel Kotkin wrote of Brown, and his thoughts on growing an economy:
The decline of progressivism continued under the next governor: Pat Brown’s son, Edmund G. “Jerry” Brown, Jr., who took office in 1975. Brown scuttled infrastructure spending, in large part because of his opposition to growth and concern for the environment. Encouraged by “reforms” backed by Brown—such as the 1978 Dill Act, which legalized collective bargaining for them—the public-employee unions became the best-organized political force in California and currently dominate Democrats in the legislature
Last month, I wrote an article about other states targeting California businesses, and commented that if California continues down this path of high taxation that other states, “…will benefit royally.”
With this proposal (a hat tip to the hard-core progressive meme of “tax the rich!” and the far more violent “eat the rich!”) Brown is pushing to the other states the workforce to go along with the businesses. Brown is actively courting the voters to vote for their own ruination. Will the people of California go for it? The results have yet to be seen.
But, if you were still looking to open a business in California, it would seem that one-way moving vans is the market to be in.
From my article at Pajamas Media, a raid at a Venice Beach food store shows the lengths government agencies will go to in order to “protect” the people. However, the larger the nanny state grows, the less freedoms we get for our protection:
In Venice, CA, a beach community in Los Angeles, the owner of a health food market was arrested, along with two others, according to the Los Angeles County District Attorney, for the, “…criminal conspiracy charges stemming from the alleged illegal production and sale of unpasteurized goat milk, goat cheese and other products.”
As the Los Angeles Times reported:
The arrests followed a one-year investigation during which undercover agents purchased unpasteurized dairy products from Healthy Family Farms stands in Los Angeles, Ventura and Santa Barbara counties, said Matthew Krasnowski, a district attorney spokesman. The products included unpasteurized goat milk, cheese and yogurt.
Yes, a year long investigation to go after the sale of unpasteurized milk, cheese and yogurt. And not just one government agency, but nine different governmental agencies, according to the LA District Attorney’s office:
Agencies taking part in the ongoing investigation include the U.S. Food and Drug Administration; the California Franchise Tax Board; the California Department of Food and Agriculture’s Milk and Dairy Food Safety Branch and the department’s Division of Measurement Standards; the Los Angeles County District Attorney’s Office; the Los Angeles County Department of Public Health; the Ventura County Sheriff’s Department, the Ventura County Department of Public Health; the Los Angeles Police Department and the Los Angeles Department of Building and Safety.
The investigation ended in the raid of the Venice market, Rawesome Foods, and a farm, Palmer’s Healthy Family Farms in Ventura County. Prosecutors claim that Rawesome Foods did not have a license to sell unpasteurized milk, which is required by the state of California. Rawesome Foods, however, is not open to the public. It is a private club that requires a paid membership. It is not known how undercover officers got into the club to purchase the dairy items, or if they paid for a membership. This is not the first raid on Rawesome Foods. They were raided in 2010 for the sale of unpasteurized, or “raw” milk.
What is known is that the government has gone too far in “protecting” its citizens. Grown men and women have the right to eat whatever they want. While you and I may not think raw goat milk is the way to enjoy our Captain Crunch, there is no reason that government should outlaw its sale. Further, the licensing requirements are called in to question when the type of sale does not fit into its parameters (to the public versus via private membership club.) On the surface, this looks more like governmental bullying than “protecting” the unpasteurized goat-milk-drinking public (which one could assume is a very niche market.)
The Tea Party movement has long advocated for smaller government as one of its central tenants. This unwarranted attack on this small business is a perfect analogy as to why the Tea Party is on the side of all Americans who believe in personal liberty. The politics of the owners of Rawesome Foods and Palmer’s Farm isn’t important. The conversation here is about the continued over reach of government into our food and food choices. We’ve seen New York work to ban salt and trans fats from restaurants. In California, food establishments are required to post calorie counts of all items. McDonald’s is under attack for putting toys in Happy Meals, and now will only offer apple slices with Happy Meals instead of french fries. In Chicago schools, students can have their home packed lunch thrown away, and then be forced to purchase the school lunch.
All of those things are not the advancement of a society, but a horrific growth of the Nanny State. And, as we see from Rawesome, no one is immune. From McDonalds to private food markets to the schools, government feels compelled to control what we eat. Recently, it was announced that August 20th is Lemonade Freedom Day, in response to the nationwide crackdown on kids’ lemonade stands by police. Perhaps a Food Freedom Day will be next, as it certainly seems it is needed.
Enjoy The Show!
Tony talks about the debt situation with Rep. Tom McClintock (R-CA.) Then, Fini Goodman joins in on the conversation of code words.
Podcast: Play in new window | Download
Enjoy The Show!
Live from the studios of PJTV, Tony speaks with James O’Keefe about the latest videos from The Project Veritas and the corruption in Medicaid, then Rep. Tom McClintock (R-CA) gives the latest on Cut, Cap and Balance.
Podcast: Play in new window | Download
Enjoy the Show!
Tony shows how big government regulations kill – literally. Then, Fini Goodman calls in to talk about the insanity of celebrity and why vegans look so sick.
Podcast: Play in new window | Download
Recently, Tony went with PJTV to cover the Conservative Principles Conference, put on by Iowa Congressman Steve King (R). In addition, Tony spoke on the media panel (with WHO Radio personality Jan Mickelson and editor of TheIowaRepublican.com Craig Robinson) and addressed the first in nation status of the Iowa caucus. An edited version will be available soon.
