The Democrats and Republicans have proven that they are servants — bought and paid for by the 1% — who are not doing what’s in the best interest of the American people,

Barr has been a supporter of the Occupy Wall Street movement (that is, the violent, raping, drug abusing, shoot at the White House, put babies on railroad tracks Occupy Wall Street movement.) She has now taken their language and made it part of her platform.

But, based on her own Tweets, perhaps being President isn’t what Barr is after. Back on January 1st, before filling out paperwork, Barr tweeted to a follower:

@genesdaughter vote for me and help get a third party off the ground as soon as possible& force Obama to go more left!!

Is Barr’s position not be President, but, by her actions, force President Obama to be more to the Left? Yes, according to full on Socialists like Barr who believe that bankers should be sent to re-education camps if they don’t give up the money they make, Obama (who believes in higher taxes, wealth redistribution and attempting to dispel the fact of American Exceptionalism) needs to be even more Left.

Barr maybe suffering from delusions of grandeur….or just delusions in general. Back in June, Barr let this nugget fly:

vote for me i know how to fix every fucking thing!

And, as early as 2010, Barr was discussing her desire for world domination. In front of the White House, Barr announced that she would “…fix everything that is wrong with the world, myself.” And, in an ode to class and gender warfare, she declared:

…I declare patriarchal politics obsolete. And I call forth divine matriarchy, the only thing that can save this planet at this late date. Patriarchy is impotent, and qualitatively unable to solve even the most simple problems in the cosmos, such as picking up their own socks or placing a carton of milk back in the refrigerator after drinking from it.

Barr is clearly saying that men are responsible for all the damage in the world (and, one would guess, the lightbulb, the Polio Vaccine and putting her show on TV for 10 seasons.) Yes, this is gender warfare and total nonsense. But, look at her examples: Picking up after one’s self? Putting things back where they belong? That sounds like personal responsibility to me. And, who could argue with Step Three in her platform?

I will outlaw bullshit.

Unfortunately for Barr, she’s very confused. Personal responsibility and being opposed to bullshit are Tea Party principles. Guillotines, re-education camps and caps on wealth, along with class warfare, are the purview of the Left. Her overall desire is to “force” Obama even more Left. And she may very well be the Green Party candidate for President.

A Presidential race for the ages.

A breakdown of the numbers shows great promise for Romney going forward. Certainly, the top line is enough for many; Romney beat Newt Gingrich (32%) by 14 points and nearly tripled former Senator Rick Santorum’s 13% showing. Digging deeper, Romney crushed with  those who make over $200,000 per year, those who make $100,000 to $200,000 and even scored with those who make under $50,000.

Romney turned around his fortunes with women, who he took in Florida by 22%. He also won the men by 5% over Gingrich. These are the kinds of numbers that bode well for a front runner, that put an election out of reach and allow the term “electability” to rise up without being ad hominem nonsense.

However, Romney the “electable,” at least in Florida, is not the same as Romney the inevitable. No matter how loudly the establishment will claim that Romney’s win in Florida means that he is the nominee, that hasn’t been established at all.

Romney’s victory in Florida was three fold – Gingrich’s poor debate performance in Jacksonville, overwhelming financial force and a flood of negative ads. On TV alone, Romney spent $15.4 million to Gingrich’s $3.4 million. Put another way, Romney had 65 TV ads for every one ad by Gingrich. Over all, Romney outspent Gingrich 15 to 1. As long as Romney is going up against a less financially infused candidate, all is well. But voters know that President Obama will raise a lot of cash, even if it is less than the purported $1 billion war chest. That also doesn’t include the free media Obama will get from mainstream media outlets.

Negative ads ruled Florida. 93% of all ads in Florida were negative ads. For Romney, it was important to come out on the offensive, to be able to show that he can attack and stand his ground. But the ads can have a boomerang effect. Negative ads leave a negative taste in the mouths of voters, and that might get felt in Nevada, Colorado, Arizona, Michigan and beyond. For Romney, however, they worked…and worked well. Florida is a testament to the power of a well-constructed negative ad.

Yet, they only worked in the south of the state, which is, in actuality, the Northeast. In the panhandle to the North, where the actual “southerners” live, Newt Gingrich was the clear winner. With the population centered in the south, Romney’s calculation was correct. But the map makes one wonder how well a negative campaign will play in the rest of the nation.

Gingrich damaged his brand with his poor debate performance in Jacksonville. He seemed lost, without energy and simply dull. It was more than just his fiery jousting with Juan Williams and John King that handed him South Carolina, it was that he was right in both places. He took the absurdity, and the audacity, of the questions and turned them on their head – giving America a “Finally!” moment, where voters were able to see a candidate react to nonsense questions the way they would. Gingrich did not make use of these opportunities in Jacksonville. He let them sail by, and he let Romney seem more aggressive, and more presidential.

Gingrich also failed on many levels of campaigning. His ads, certainly negative, were also called into question for their validity. Most recently, his robo-call that as Governor of Massachusetts Romney cut off Kosher meals to nursing home residents who were Holocaust survivors. It was not only in bad taste, it was also not true. Romney was changing where the meals were made to reduce costs, not eliminating the meals all together.

However, no number is more important than the turnout statistics. Primary turn out in 2012 was less than that of 2008. Further 57% of Republicans are looking for a different choice. William Kristol of The Weekly Standard is already asking if we all shouldn’t be looking at Santorum as the answer. A look at the vote totals shows more people voted against Mitt Romney than voted for Mitt Romney. Romney votes – 775,015, Gingrich/Santorum/Paul votes –  873,011. But, as Ed Morrissey noted:

Even if one of them dropped out, though, that wouldn’t mean that the entire non-Romney vote would coalesce behind the survivor…PPP’s (Public Policy Polling) final Florida poll showed that Romney came in second in the second-choice category at 18%, with Rick Santorum in first at 26% and Gingrich slightly behind Romney at 17%, and 31% saying “someone else/not sure.”  It also assumes Paul’s voters would flock to either Gingrich or Santorum, which seems laughably speculative at best.  If Santorum had dropped out, Gingrich wouldn’t have won Florida, and the reverse is even more true

No, Romney would have won Florida either way. But his future depends on continued negative ads (which may not play in the rest of the nation) and massive amounts of money to push those ads. Romney took in $24 million in the last quarter. Obama raised $42 million last quarter. And, for all of Romney’s spending, he has only a 48 delegate lead over Gingrich. The race continues. The establishment waits.

What I can not accept, what I cannot just simply sit and abide, sit and listen to is this idea of the conventional wisdom. Allow me to be clear. Mitt Romney does not have the nomination sewn up.

Tony talks to Sen. Mike Lee (R-UT) about President Obama’s unconstitutional recess appointments. Sen. Lee reiterates his position to hold up other presidential appointments until Obama rescinds his appointment of Richard Cordray and others.

Then, the Vodka Pundit, Stephen Green, breaks down the 2012 field. The show ends as it does every Friday, with the Cigar of the Week, sponsored by Cigars In Review Magazine.

NOTE – Unfortunately, we lost a good three minutes of audio with Sen. Lee. It goes out about two minutes in, and comes back at 5:04. Feel free to just skip this segment, and hear Sen. Lee talk about how he will no longer give consent to Obama’s nominees.

Asked by radio host Tony Katz whether he had a “horse in the race,” referring to a preferred candidate in the GOP field, Lee responded that he didn’t, but:

I think Mitt Romney was the winner of the debate (in Jacksonville,) and I think Newt Gingrich was the loser of the debate.

When asked if Gingrich can turn around his performance in the next five days, Lee stated:

He (Gingrich) has blossommed twice now, only to wither….I don’t think he comes back from this one.

When pressed by Katz about his seemingly obvious lean towards Romney, Lee opened up:

At this point…I haven’t endorsed anyone, but if there were such a thing as an anti-endorsement I’d be tempted to bring out an anti-endorsement against Newt Gingrich. I’ve been appalled with the fact that he has, in effect, attacked other candidates, particularly Mitt Romney, based on the fact that he’s a capitalist, based on the fact that he’s been successful. He tried to pit one group of Americans against another and become a divider, much like our President is doing. It almost has a class warfare feel to it. And that doesn’t sit well with conservatives, or Republicans in general, and I don’t think it is going to work.

Sen. Lee appeared on the show to discuss President Obama’s unconstitutional recess appointments, and his willingness to hold up other appointments until the situation is rectified.

Tony shows his disgust for Democrats and Republicans, and their unwillingness to stand up to President Obama for his dictatorial assault on the Constitution. Stephen Green of VodkaPundit.com weighs in on the subject. Then, we bring the Cigar of the Week, presented by CigarsInReviewMagazine.com.

On the show, Tony addresses the latest attack from President Obama on the US Constitution, and wonders if the House or Senate GOP will respond or allow this abuse to continue. Then, Tony sees a way clear for Gov. Rick Perry to succeed in South Carolina.

While the world wants to celebrate President Obama’s victory in the world of tax cuts, Tony points out the unfortunate after-effects of The Obama Tax, and how that $40 a paycheck is nothing compared to what you have been paying. The, are Cupcakes the work of terrorists?